John-Popovici / duel-of-the-eights

Other
1 stars 0 forks source link

TA Review - Incompatible Extra #35

Closed John-Popovici closed 4 hours ago

John-Popovici commented 4 hours ago

Artifact Under Review Problem Statement and Goals

Rubric Section and Grade Number of Goals - 2/3

Description of Issue The quantification of an "Enjoyable game" is based on user feedback. This looks like it involves something that is considered an "extra", and the group lists 4 extras when only 2 are required. So this measurement would require a mandatory extra that gathers user feedback, otherwise, there won't be a way to measure this goal.

John-Popovici commented 4 hours ago

The goal has the following metric to ensure measurability: Based on user feedback, a minimum of 75% consider the experience as enjoyable.

One of our four extras listed is "Focus groups, Surveys, and Interviews" while another is "Usability testing" both of which would include user feedback, so this additional extra is not something we believe we need.

Additionally, having 4 extras when 2 was asked should not be an issue, as these documents are "living documents" and we intend to do all 4 but can update them as appropriate if we only do 2. This requirement of 2 extras is not in the checklist nor on the rubric. The professor has even suggested we can discuss if this is a challenging project and this might not need to do any extras.