From Nicolas Lancesseur,
Specific comments
• Features that we particularly like
o The extensive list of existing open-source data platforms and references (that could be regularly updated with the evolution of the literature?)
o The link to the Excel file in the introductive page displaying existing solutions from data providers
o The detailed assumptions relative to the NGFS scenarios in the generated reports
o The clear summary of the exposure inputs at the beginning of the institutional report to avoid potential mistake from the user
o The consideration of the opportunities from the transition
• Propositions & comments
o When quantitative elements are provided in the reports (either projected hypotheses or estimated results), the sources should be given more systematically, including the reference to the model used for the NGFS hypotheses, which is not given every time.
o The references list provided in the generated reports is very useful, but it would be even more useful with a bit more context related to the content of the source (dataset, econometric estimation, theoretical paper, etc.)
o On the “Report type selection” page, it would be useful for users to have one or two lines explaining the difference of approach between institutional report and sector report (for instance something like “if you want to generate a report depending on your own sectoral and geographical exposure”, “if you want to access the complete risk assessment for a sector or a country”, etc.)
o For the institutional report, the inputs that the user needs to provide could be shortly specified for more clarity
o Once the user clicks on the source or reference link, if he/she did not open it in a new tab the previous report cannot be recovered without starting the process again
o The download button does not allow the user to save the report because of a typo in the address (“htm” instead of “html”).
o Using two separate windows of the tool seems to dysfunction
o For the institutional report, the users can select only one scenario among the three available in the tool. A command could be added to provide an institutional report including all the scenarios.
o Formal sectors should be distinguished from sovereign issuers for more clarity
o In the NGFS Disorderly scenario presentation at the beginning of each report including this scenario, there is a typo: “In Disorderly transition risk scnearios”
From Nicolas Lancesseur, Specific comments • Features that we particularly like o The extensive list of existing open-source data platforms and references (that could be regularly updated with the evolution of the literature?) o The link to the Excel file in the introductive page displaying existing solutions from data providers o The detailed assumptions relative to the NGFS scenarios in the generated reports o The clear summary of the exposure inputs at the beginning of the institutional report to avoid potential mistake from the user o The consideration of the opportunities from the transition • Propositions & comments o When quantitative elements are provided in the reports (either projected hypotheses or estimated results), the sources should be given more systematically, including the reference to the model used for the NGFS hypotheses, which is not given every time. o The references list provided in the generated reports is very useful, but it would be even more useful with a bit more context related to the content of the source (dataset, econometric estimation, theoretical paper, etc.) o On the “Report type selection” page, it would be useful for users to have one or two lines explaining the difference of approach between institutional report and sector report (for instance something like “if you want to generate a report depending on your own sectoral and geographical exposure”, “if you want to access the complete risk assessment for a sector or a country”, etc.) o For the institutional report, the inputs that the user needs to provide could be shortly specified for more clarity o Once the user clicks on the source or reference link, if he/she did not open it in a new tab the previous report cannot be recovered without starting the process again o The download button does not allow the user to save the report because of a typo in the address (“htm” instead of “html”). o Using two separate windows of the tool seems to dysfunction o For the institutional report, the users can select only one scenario among the three available in the tool. A command could be added to provide an institutional report including all the scenarios. o Formal sectors should be distinguished from sovereign issuers for more clarity o In the NGFS Disorderly scenario presentation at the beginning of each report including this scenario, there is a typo: “In Disorderly transition risk scnearios”