As seen here, we do a very good job of geomatching each year except for 2005 due to a $700k entry called "parks."
However, there is no reason why we can't bump up the 2009 and 2010 numbers by manually replacing whatever small typos are causing the geocoding script to miss ~500k.
As seen here, we do a very good job of geomatching each year except for 2005 due to a $700k entry called "parks."
However, there is no reason why we can't bump up the 2009 and 2010 numbers by manually replacing whatever small typos are causing the geocoding script to miss ~500k.