search

JohnDoee / autotorrent

Matches torrents with files and gets them seeded
MIT License
269 stars 34 forks source link

qbittorrent vs Deluge conclusion qbittorrent is better and grabbing files #30

Open ghost opened 5 years ago

ghost commented 5 years ago

This is more of a statement not a question depending on your setup it seems deluge might not be good at picking up every torrent yet

I'd like to try with the stable channel to see if I can get the same results.

The effect is that qbittorrent is able to seed way more torrents then deluge. The error below results in those torrents not being added. If though they are 100 percent in the database. 


    filedump=filedump, options=options, filename=filename, save_state=save_state
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/deluge-1.3.15-py2.7.egg/deluge/core/torrentmanager.py", line 364, in add
    torrent_info.rename_file(index, fname.encode('utf8'))
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc2 in position 172: ordinal not in range(128)
JohnDoee commented 5 years ago

Hmm, that's not so good.

Can you tell me what kind of character the problematic torrents contain ?

ghost commented 5 years ago

I think the \ below mean space or something it is going further then subdirectories Pastesbin for qbittorrent directory names https://pastebin.com/JxTsj41r

Pastebin for Deluge Directories Name https://pastebin.com/grNTxVzz

Comparing effectively is kind of hard to do because I'm seeing now now the api doesn't always lead to the same directory name it seems But these are suspected directories https://pastebin.com/rR11d4AE