The simple alignment scoring we introduced in #6 does not catch missed coreferent mentions. This will lead to some less-than-perfect alignments with scores of 1.0. I don't currently have a proposal to solve this, but it is the last kink to work out before we can really trust the scores computed on the validation and test sets.
The simple alignment scoring we introduced in #6 does not catch missed coreferent mentions. This will lead to some less-than-perfect alignments with scores of 1.0. I don't currently have a proposal to solve this, but it is the last kink to work out before we can really trust the scores computed on the validation and test sets.