Open chris-belcher opened 9 years ago
Two thoughts:
This would increase the size of the tx. What about use p2sh only when this is requested by the taker? S/he could request (N-K) P2SH outputs and K P2PKH outputs
CoinJoins in general make the transaction bigger, it might end up being something we simply accept. But your idea could also be a viable solution too, yes.
What happens when each of those makers wants to spend their p2sh coins under the taker-requests idea? Does it draw any more attention to the transaction.
What happens when each of those makers wants to spend their p2sh coins under the taker-requests idea? Does it draw any more attention to the transaction.
I don't think that it is an issue when p2sh are used as inputs, this does not reveal anything of unknown.
It would provide some privacy for senders to p2sh. The actual form of p2sh could be a mixture of 2-of-2, 2-of-3 and perhaps other types. Passive observers of the blockchain don't know the private keys are all owned by the same entity.
I think 2-of-3 is the most common, although sites like http://p2sh.info/ don't show that specific statistic.