Open n13 opened 3 years ago
Hello, I have a question:
planted
, reward owner
and reward
, should they be settings?Hello, I have a question:
- The only additional parameter it should take is the max invite amount, right? But what would happen with the parameters described in #236:
planted
,reward owner
andreward
, should they be settings?
Yeah I think they need to be parameters also
The bank for invite proposals, should be the Campaigns bank. Only campaign proposals have sub types (it has subtypes, because the voting tokens should be the same)
What if instead of subtypes, we have a "voting pool id" for each Type, so we can have two different Types that uses the same voting pool.
Ex: Campaign Type: Alliances Voting Pool ID: Alliances Funding bank: Alliances
Campaign Type: Funding Campaigns Voting Pool ID: Campaigns Funding bank: Campaigns
Campaign Type: Invite Campaigns Voting Pool ID: Campaigns Funding bank: Campaigns
Campaign Type: Referendums Voting Pool ID: Referendums Funding bank: Referendums
Campaign Type: Milestones Voting Pool ID: Campaigns Funding bank: Milestones
Maybe add an index to walk accross only on eval proposal, with their own cpu time, so we can schedule processing each type on a different time.
There will be two Campaign proposals sub types: Invite campaign and funding campaign
Both are voted on from the campaign votes, so no changes there, it's not really a new voting type.
Funding campaign - no different from existing campaign type
Invite campaign -