JonasKruckenberg / imagetools

Load and transform images using a toolbox :toolbox: of custom import directives!
MIT License
909 stars 56 forks source link

chore(deps): update pnpm to v8.15.1 #692

Closed renovate[bot] closed 7 months ago

renovate[bot] commented 7 months ago

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pnpm (source) 8.15.0 -> 8.15.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pnpm/pnpm (pnpm) ### [`v8.15.1`](https://togithub.com/pnpm/pnpm/releases/tag/v8.15.1) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/pnpm/pnpm/compare/v8.15.0...v8.15.1) #### Patch Changes - Use the `object-hash` library instead of `node-object-hash` for hashing keys of side-effects cache [#​7591](https://togithub.com/pnpm/pnpm/pull/7591). - `bundledDependencies` should never be added to the lockfile with `false` as the value [#​7576](https://togithub.com/pnpm/pnpm/issues/7576). #### Platinum Sponsors
#### Gold Sponsors
#### Our Silver Sponsors

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.



This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

changeset-bot[bot] commented 7 months ago

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4fd9d3efe7fb6e1b67c4412318b2fe529b3b03af

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

codecov[bot] commented 7 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (294ba4c) 93.60% compared to head (4fd9d3e) 93.60%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #692 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.60% 93.60% ======================================= Files 32 32 Lines 1189 1189 Branches 189 189 ======================================= Hits 1113 1113 Misses 76 76 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/JonasKruckenberg/imagetools/pull/692/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Jonas+Kruckenberg) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [imagetools-core](https://app.codecov.io/gh/JonasKruckenberg/imagetools/pull/692/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Jonas+Kruckenberg) | `97.01% <ø> (ø)` | | | [vite-imagetools](https://app.codecov.io/gh/JonasKruckenberg/imagetools/pull/692/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Jonas+Kruckenberg) | `78.44% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Jonas+Kruckenberg#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.