Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This isn't a fauxbar bug. This is a chrome bug.
No extension have access to this setting or can control it.
Report this bug here: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list
Original comment by laboboL...@gmail.com
on 31 Mar 2012 at 3:01
yes, as explained above, this is beyond control.
One not-so-nice solution could be unpacking the extension, modify manifest.json
file to remove extension icon browser behavior then pack and sign again.
I don't like the icon either as I prefer a tiny bar.
Original comment by core...@gmail.com
on 3 Apr 2012 at 7:08
Yes, this is a byproduct of Fauxbar Memory Helper disabling and enabling
Fauxbar. Chrome doesn't remember that you want the Fauxbar button to stay
hidden. Might be a Chrome "feature".
The Fauxbar toolbar button was first introduced when I added the Fauxbar Lite
extension.
Perhaps the Fauxbar button is unnecessary for Fauxbar. Chrome's New Tab button
does the same thing (assuming you opt to have the button open Fauxbar in a new
tab - its default behaviour).
But there might be users that like having the button open Fauxbar in the
current tab, or a new window, I'm not sure. Or even just having it there to
quickly access Fauxbar's options with a right-click.
coreguy's suggestion would work, but yeah, I don't really feel like maintaining
a third branch of Fauxbar just for this option :/
I *think* it'd be okay to remove it from Fauxbar as it does seem overkill. But
maybe I could run a poll on Facebook or something and see what people have set,
just to see?
Original comment by fauxbar....@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2012 at 3:44
online polling is fine.
also I think removing icon first from the lite edition could serve as a testing
approach. By doing this, fauxbar lite is in a more "lite" sense, meanwhile
responses regarding the removal can be gathered.
Original comment by core...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2012 at 12:46
Once issue #2 is fixed (involving converting Fauxbar's background page into an
event page, and using Chrome's new alarms instead of JavaScript's setTimeout
function), Memory Helper will be no more, and this problem will go away.
Please star issue #2 for future updates on this.
Original comment by fauxbar....@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2013 at 5:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
owen.zah...@gmail.com
on 22 Mar 2012 at 12:32