Closed gmccarthy0188 closed 3 years ago
Would you want separate search fields, or would one universal search be sufficient?
I think one universal field would suffice?
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021, 5:40 PM Jonathan Guberman notifications@github.com wrote:
Would you want separate search fields, or would one universal search be sufficient?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JonathanGuberman/unmatched_maker/issues/47#issuecomment-756431050, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEA6EMFWXZ5SJGIYB3JWTSTSYYZ4RANCNFSM4VZIJ4BA .
I started on this, and got carried away:
solid metal
would not have returned decks with metal gear solid
); now, search is tokenized, so word order doesn't matter. To search for an exact term, enclose it in quotes (e.g., "solid metal"
).u:
, user:
, c:
, creator:
, n:
, name:
, d:
, or deck:
. E.g., u:metal d:"gear solid" snake
will show decks that have metal
in the username, gear solid
in the deck name, and snake
in either the username or the deck name.-
(minus sign) in front of it, with no spaces. E.g., u:metal -d:"gear solid" snake
will show decks that have metal
in the username and snake
in either the username or the deck name, but does NOT have the phrase gear solid
in the deck name.
In our personal Fan Decks, sorting by Published Yes/No is not working. Filtering by Published Yes/No would also be handy (Right now I am using a tag to accomplish this instead, and manually maintaining it on each deck.)
Searching and Filtering based on Creator name would also be handy in the general fan decks area.