Closed bcapt closed 10 months ago
We might be able to work around this, but I have to ask: why are you packaging asan-enabled binaries for distribution? Normally asan binaries are used for debug testing, but you wouldn't ship them, since they can be significantly larger and slower than a release build.
Oh, in such case, Let me simply try to re-compile my binary without it. Sorry for being ignorant of the fact that this is usually used in a non-release build.
Hi, I've got a binary that requires libasan.so library that has to come first. This is an error I am getting when trying to run static binary after it is converted by the staticx tool:
I am wondering if there's a way to fix this other than recompiling the binary without the
-fsanitize=address
option.