Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
when you go to
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1470272&group_id=16339
1&atid=827563
it says the tracker has been disabled for the group... so i can't reference the
original ticket... could someone possibly repost it and update the ticket here?
Original comment by weare...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2009 at 2:54
The problem is that overriding document.createElement is far from sufficient.
There
are a lot of ways to create elements and you can always use initElement as a
work
aroound.
Original comment by erik.arv...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2009 at 6:22
This topic came up again on the discussion group. Here is the thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-excanvas/t/4297a91783f9b170
The result was that not only is patching document.createElement insufficient,
because it doesn't catch the other
ways canvas elements can be created, but it also imposes a performance penalty
for every element you want to
create that is *not* a canvas. Hence the decision was not to implement this. So
I think this ticket can be closed
as "won't fix". Perhaps before that is done the issue's title could be made
more specific.
Original comment by ryandesi...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2009 at 10:58
Issue 46 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by erik.arv...@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2009 at 2:13
Original comment by erik.arv...@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2009 at 2:14
Though this still suffers from the performance issue (and therefore presumably
won't cause a reconsideration), for those seeking their own workaround, the
following ought to solve the issue with the other ways canvas elements may be
created:
Add the following at the very end of the closure:
if (typeof HTMLDocument !== 'undefined') {
var oldCreateElement = document.createElement;
HTMLDocument.prototype.createElement = function (el) {
if (el.toLowerCase() === 'canvas') {
var canvas = oldCreateElement.call(this, el);
G_vmlCanvasManager.initElement(canvas);
return canvas;
}
return oldCreateElement.call(this, el);
};
}
Original comment by bret...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2014 at 1:58
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
erik.arv...@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2009 at 12:31