Closed mortezadadgar closed 1 month ago
This is an interesting case and I can see the reasoning of keeping the defaults from Vim. I also saw that support for single-line comments was added in C99, so it hasn't always been a part of the language.
However, this seems like a pretty subjective change and could be easily configured by the user. Also, this change would technically be a breaking change, so I'm quite hesitant to accept this.
Could we somehow ask for more opinions about this, from people who write C?
plugins like Comment.nvim
already change the commentstring based on line or block wise mappings i don't see the rational of being in business of changing commentstring, after #86 get merged I don't think there's any reason to change commentstring where it's not needed, anything I am missing?
I think it should be configurable by the user.
I personally prefer C++ style (//
) but had a job interview on a codebase not using C99, therefore requiring /* */
.
Some major OSS projects like Wine require that type of comments, for example.
If there must be a default, I think for C it should be /* */
, especially if it's Vim's default.
Thanks for the input @zyriab! Let's merge this, then. I suppose we can follow the Vim defaults without worrying about things too much. It's a bit of a breaking change though, so I'll add a comment to the breaking changes issue about it.
separated this from the #84 as I think this require some discussions. this change has been made to follow default behavior of vim ftplugin which is always to use
/* %s */
not matter it's block or line-wise commenting. and besides that plugins likevim-commentray
andmini.comment
doesn't even support block commenting and therefore this come to surprising new users as their C commentstring has changed from this plugin