Introduction is very informative and provides lots of statistics and data that is effective in engaging the reader. Arguably could have had a lot of the statistics in the background section along with the additional information in section 2. Sources of information should be put into a reference list
2.1. This section effectively shows the relevancy and accuracy of the sources used. Could convey background information without having to compare articles but otherwise very good. Concisely covers the majority of the COVID-19 topic.
2.2. Very concise and easy to understand. Shows exactly how each stakeholder impacts on the models.
2.3. I believe this section does not need to start with a definition of models, otherwise very well written. Sources should be in a reference list at the bottom
2.4. It would be better to address what these current models help with before going into why they are ineffective in solving the coronavirus issue. This will give the reader a better understanding of why the government thinks these models are effective.
3.1. No sources for any of the models. The models are explained very well.
3.2. Application of models to the COVID-19 situation is explained well at the end of each brief. No sources for any of the paragraphs.
3.3. Graphs used are very effective in helping depict what is being said in the paragraphs.
Overall: The structure of the report is well set out. However, a reference list is required at the end of the report with all used sources. Other than that and some minor things, the report was overall very good and was effective in explaining the background of the COVID-19 situation and using models to show how they can be improved. Good job guys!
2.1. This section effectively shows the relevancy and accuracy of the sources used. Could convey background information without having to compare articles but otherwise very good. Concisely covers the majority of the COVID-19 topic. 2.2. Very concise and easy to understand. Shows exactly how each stakeholder impacts on the models. 2.3. I believe this section does not need to start with a definition of models, otherwise very well written. Sources should be in a reference list at the bottom 2.4. It would be better to address what these current models help with before going into why they are ineffective in solving the coronavirus issue. This will give the reader a better understanding of why the government thinks these models are effective.
3.1. No sources for any of the models. The models are explained very well. 3.2. Application of models to the COVID-19 situation is explained well at the end of each brief. No sources for any of the paragraphs. 3.3. Graphs used are very effective in helping depict what is being said in the paragraphs.
Overall: The structure of the report is well set out. However, a reference list is required at the end of the report with all used sources. Other than that and some minor things, the report was overall very good and was effective in explaining the background of the COVID-19 situation and using models to show how they can be improved. Good job guys!