Open Josverl opened 7 months ago
often init is well documented , where init is not This is seen on multiple classess
init
for example _rp2.StateMachine ¶
_rp2.StateMachine
The constructor has minimal documentation rp2.StateMachine(id[, program, ...])
def __init__(self, id, program, *args, **kwargs) -> None: ...
While the initfunction has ample documentation.
StateMachine.init(program, freq=-1, *, in_base=None, out_base=None, set_base=None, jmp_pin=None, sideset_base=None, in_shiftdir=None, out_shiftdir=None, push_thresh=None, pull_thresh=None)
def init( self, program, freq=-1, *, in_base=None, out_base=None, set_base=None, jmp_pin=None, sideset_base=None, in_shiftdir=None, out_shiftdir=None, push_thresh=None, pull_thresh=None, ) -> None:
often
init
is well documented , where init is not This is seen on multiple classessfor example
_rp2.StateMachine
¶The constructor has minimal documentation rp2.StateMachine(id[, program, ...])
While the
init
function has ample documentation.StateMachine.init(program, freq=-1, *, in_base=None, out_base=None, set_base=None, jmp_pin=None, sideset_base=None, in_shiftdir=None, out_shiftdir=None, push_thresh=None, pull_thresh=None)