Fairly generic, visual design could be pushed more
Quality layouts and unique, personable content & design
Unique and recognizable as you, with engaging, personable content & design
Text content
Fake content only
Some real content, some fake
All real content but with lots of errors
Real content, well written, no grammar or spelling errors
Accessibility
No considerations
Added some alt attributes, nothing else
Just the basics: alt attributes, roles
Accessibility is well considered and tested
Pages & images
Barely started
Missing lots of pages & images
Has most of the pages, some placeholder images
All pages exist and are well done with complete imagery
Image quality
Only placeholder images
Some portfolio piece images
Lots of images but low quality
High quality portfolio images — and lots of them
Responsiveness
Not responsive
Works on some screens
Responsive but with lots of awkwardness
Looks great on all screen sizes
Performance
Mega slow…
Slow…
Could load faster
Blazing fast awesomeness
Code quality
Barely started
Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics
Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics
Well indented, fully valid, good semantics
Grade: 23/27 no javascript
Rationale
Each project has a short description to give the viewer context into the project at hand. My about page also offers details into the kind of work I do and alludes to my past experiences in the media industry.
The website has a distinctive personality which is simple and sleek. Including subtle animations was an obvious choice because motion is my specialty. I believe black, red, and white are a nice combination with good contrast so I chose them as my brand colours. The layout is grid based and uses consistent components throughout. I truly feel the branding represents me very well. The projects I chose also reflect my interests nicely.
I wrote the original text content in plain English without spelling errors. I tested the accessibility with all of the tools listed on the Learn the Web accessibility checklist. I also used browser tools to further this testing.
All pages and images are completed and have high quality images/videos to complement them. All pages of the website are responsive to suit different kinds of screens. The performance passed all the required checks and seems to run quite smoothly.
Finally, the code written is pretty well. There may be some errors somewhere, but over it is functional.
@thomasjbradley
http://www.jennyowens.ca/
Grade: 23/27 no javascript
Rationale Each project has a short description to give the viewer context into the project at hand. My about page also offers details into the kind of work I do and alludes to my past experiences in the media industry.
The website has a distinctive personality which is simple and sleek. Including subtle animations was an obvious choice because motion is my specialty. I believe black, red, and white are a nice combination with good contrast so I chose them as my brand colours. The layout is grid based and uses consistent components throughout. I truly feel the branding represents me very well. The projects I chose also reflect my interests nicely.
I wrote the original text content in plain English without spelling errors. I tested the accessibility with all of the tools listed on the Learn the Web accessibility checklist. I also used browser tools to further this testing.
All pages and images are completed and have high quality images/videos to complement them. All pages of the website are responsive to suit different kinds of screens. The performance passed all the required checks and seems to run quite smoothly.
Finally, the code written is pretty well. There may be some errors somewhere, but over it is functional.