Joystream / atlas

Whitelabel consumer and publisher experience for Joystream
https://www.joystream.org
GNU General Public License v3.0
100 stars 45 forks source link

Design team summaries #816

Closed KubaMikolajczyk closed 2 years ago

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

This is a long-living issue for the Atlas design team to post summaries of their work to share with the community

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

14.06 - 18.06

1. What was achieved:

2. Departures

3.Github

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

21.06 - 25.06

1. What was achieved:

2. Departures

3. Opens

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

28.06 - 02.07

1. What was achieved:

  1. Departures

    • There were no blockers
  2. Opens To review: https://github.com/Joystream/atlas/issues/878#issuecomment-872097425 Progress made on player

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

05.07 - 09.07

1. What was achieved:

2. Departures

3. Opens

bedeho commented 3 years ago

Feedback

Overall, phenomenal work, and really impressive how detailed you have been on all the interactions on those seemingly simple components, its really easy to forget how many different states and input types one has to cover.

Details

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

Details response:

  1. The example of headers and visual hierarchy was not be the best one I could use there. If we would scale everything altogether along with text we would have to do this with all other elements to evade scaling conflicts and retain the same content structure. However, this is not a recommended practice (can cause a lot of unpredicted visual bugs) and we usually use the step approach and just show more content on wider pages. This step scaling approach allow the video titles to stay relevant & readable on all screen sizes and allows us to leave all other components at their initial size. In this approach we have only two sizes for video title font and the video thumbnail scales accordingly to the grid & available space.

  2. Yes! This wasn't covered yet and responsiveness of video content pages will be on my plate this week. If it comes to channel - in the new responsiveness it would have 4 videos in a row max (Channel rwd: https://www.figma.com/file/TGUpBXgXf9ceMvHbRB5BIx/Joystream-Atlas?node-id=9951%3A252666) - because it would use this more narrow type of grid - unlike video content pages where the maximum width of the grid would be larger - this approach is still up for discussion but we have worked out a set of rules to define the RWD here: https://www.figma.com/file/Cc3VDoK6qglJ617ChA2EMr/Foundation?node-id=11%3A6540

  3. OK! We can remove them from this action because the button changing will be enough to notify about the action. On the other hand I think that we shouldn't say that toast are reserved for async events only as they're widely used for confirmations, simple notifications, and low-priority alerts that do not need to completely interrupt the user experience. Toasts themselves need a little more design in their behaviour in our system - but thats another issue. I will remove them from this flow :)

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

19.07 - 23.07

1. What was achieved:

2. Departures:

3. Opens

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

26.07 - 30.07

1. What was achieved

2. Departures:

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

02.08 - 06.08

1. What was achieved

2.Departures:

3.Opens:

toiletgranny commented 3 years ago

09.08 - 13.08

1. What was achieved:

2. Departures:

3. Opens:

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

16.08 - 20.08

1. What was achieved:

2. Departures

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

23.08 - 27.08

1. What was achieved:

2. Departures

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

30.08 - 03.09

1. What was achieved:

2.Departures

KubaMikolajczyk commented 3 years ago

06.09 - 10.09

1. What was achieved:

2. Departures

3. Estimates

toiletgranny commented 3 years ago

13.09 - 17.09

1. What was achieved:

Kuba:

Adam

Nina

2. Departures:

3. Estimates:

toiletgranny commented 3 years ago

20.09 - 24.09

1. What was achieved:

2. Departures:

3. Estimates:

toiletgranny commented 3 years ago

27.09 - 01.10

1. What was achieved:

Adam:

Nina:

Kuba:

2. Departures:

KubaMikolajczyk commented 2 years ago

04.10 - 08.10

1.What was achieved

Adam:

Nina:

Kuba:

2.Departures

KubaMikolajczyk commented 2 years ago

11.10 - 15.10

1.What was achieved:

Adam:

Nina:

Kuba:

2. Departures

KubaMikolajczyk commented 2 years ago

18.10 - 22.10

1.What was achieved:

Adam:

Nina:

Kuba:

Tomasz:

NFT transaction view is almost ready. There are 2 minor legibility related topics to discuss with the rest of the design team, but it should be done by Tuesday.

2. Departures

KubaMikolajczyk commented 2 years ago

25.10 - 29.10

1. What was achieved:

Adam:

Nina:

Tomasz:

Kuba:

2. Departures

3. Estimates

KubaMikolajczyk commented 2 years ago

02.11 - 05.11

1. What was achieved:

Adam:

Nina:

Tomasz:

Kuba:

2. Departures

KubaMikolajczyk commented 2 years ago

08.11 - 12.11

1.What was achieved:

Adam:

Nina:

Tomasz:

Kuba:

Departures:

KubaMikolajczyk commented 2 years ago

15.11 - 19.11

1. What was achieved:

Adam:

Nina:

Tomasz:

Kuba:

2. Departures

toiletgranny commented 2 years ago

22.11 – 26.11

1. What was achieved:

Nina:

Kuba:

Tomasz:

Adam:

2. Departures

bedeho commented 2 years ago

No longer needed.