Open dmtrjsg opened 2 years ago
@singulart is this suggestion to expose particular spending categories (if so, which ones would make most sense?) or look into the logic behind the numbers here?
After having a look: on the FE we don't do any calculations. We get it from QN (Event name = budget_spending) and its all money spent by Council.
@singulart over to you on what's a preferred target state. Pls feel free to reply here or ping me in DM on discord. Thank yoU!
@mochet WDYT?
@mochet ping :)
@mochet pls advise on the above
Since total means everything it has to be complete to be useful:
1.Column Total spent
: Councilor rewards, Channel payments, Funding requests, WG minting
WGs Minted / Refilled
: Allocated to WG, can be higher than actual spending. It makes sense to separate between WG refills (budget allocation) and actual minting events (rewardPaid
, discretionary spending).Proposals rejected
to save spaceIcing:
Minted / Refilled
For illustration see the current Council budget plan:
position | amount |
---|---|
Councilor rewards | 250,560 |
Funding proposals | 0 |
Creator payout rewards | 0 |
Other allocations | 0 |
Council minting subtotal | 250,560 |
Start Council budget | 52,646,605 |
Term Increment | 5,499,990 |
WG allocation | 1,700,900 |
End Budget | 56,195,135 |
From the handbook: https://handbook.joystream.org/system/council#budget
Notice that working group spending, such as lead spending, or subsystem specific spending, such as minting initial credit for invited new members, does not directly count against the council budget, but against the relevant working group budget.
Taken at: https://dao.joystream.org/#/council/past-councils Fields:
Browser: Chrome 102 (macOS Catalina) Screen size: 1512x982 Browser size: 1512x780 Open #284 in Usersnap
Powered by Usersnap.