search

Joystream / pioneer

Governance app for Joystream DAO
https://pioneerapp.xyz/
GNU General Public License v3.0
44 stars 70 forks source link

Proposals: Veto proposal #4669

Open mochet opened 11 months ago

mochet commented 11 months ago

Problem

This proposal type doesn't exist in Pioneer but from what I understand everything needed for it to work already exists in the runtime (maybe not the QN just yet?). It is becoming apparent that we need to have sensible grace periods on proposals and I will be trying to get them adjusted for the next runtime upgrade (after nara) (background: https://pioneerapp.xyz/#/forum/thread/717)

I couldn't find any other issue describing this so have created this one.

dmtrjsg commented 11 months ago

There's an assumption that veto proposals would not work due to sudo been removed at mainnet launch.. Perhaps we are missing smth @mnaamani could you advise pls if veto proposal would work on the liberated chain if added..

mochet commented 11 months ago

There's an assumption that veto proposals would not work due to sudo been removed at mainnet launch.. Perhaps we are missing smth @mnaamani could you advise pls if veto proposal would work on the liberated chain if added..

I did already ask Mokhtar about this and based on the response it sounds like it is in the runtime and works, just has to be surfaced by Pioneer:

It is available in the runtime yes, and supported by query-node. So technically usable, but as you quite clearly point out it is not supported in pioneer. Probably worth starting a discussion around it, as a continuation of the new council period changes, but adding it to nara scope will probably push us back until any final new numbers are agreed upon by community.

dmtrjsg commented 11 months ago

Great, but needs some design work, so should be assigned to Magda at some point when she has capacity.