I'm writing a sort of tree/xml like structure where each element can contain one or more elements with the same types of key/value pairs and I noticed that the convertor makes a "Element3" class, probably incrementing by each layer e.g:
The root and element classes reference just "Element" though, which would be correct if the "Element3" class was just "Element":
The result is even more out of sync if the Root class is made to essentially contains itself, the same as "Element3" but both classes would be made
I'm writing a sort of tree/xml like structure where each element can contain one or more elements with the same types of key/value pairs and I noticed that the convertor makes a "Element3" class, probably incrementing by each layer e.g:
The root and element classes reference just "Element" though, which would be correct if the "Element3" class was just "Element":
The result is even more out of sync if the Root class is made to essentially contains itself, the same as "Element3" but both classes would be made