Hi @JuhaHeiskala, I'm wondering if you could be convinced to register this package general registry?
For a long time, I have wanted to ditch a PyCall.jl dependency (for SciPy access to qhull) in a package of mine (see https://github.com/thchr/Brillouin.jl/issues/22) - but there wasn't any sufficiently feature-complete or platform-independent Julia-version of qhull until now. If I could depend on DirectQhull.jl, it would be a breeze to dump the PyCall.jl dependency.
In principle, it would probably be better to merge somehow with the existing Qhull.jl and MiniQhull.jl packages - but I imagine that's also much more work. From my perspective, I'd just be happy to have a working solution (thanks a ton for creating this, incidentally!).
Hi @JuhaHeiskala, I'm wondering if you could be convinced to register this package general registry?
For a long time, I have wanted to ditch a PyCall.jl dependency (for SciPy access to qhull) in a package of mine (see https://github.com/thchr/Brillouin.jl/issues/22) - but there wasn't any sufficiently feature-complete or platform-independent Julia-version of qhull until now. If I could depend on DirectQhull.jl, it would be a breeze to dump the PyCall.jl dependency.
In principle, it would probably be better to merge somehow with the existing Qhull.jl and MiniQhull.jl packages - but I imagine that's also much more work. From my perspective, I'd just be happy to have a working solution (thanks a ton for creating this, incidentally!).