Closed jbytecode closed 6 months ago
Thank you @jbytecode for your time in these amendements. I am willing to merge this but regarding the third change, I actually marginally prefer the original layout where the table wasn't split over two pages (and where the logical flow may be viewed to be more natural).
I understand that the Statement of Need is a critical section; likely more critical than Design Principles
. Would it resonate with you if we reorder only these two? This is actually the form (Design Principles at the end) that the paper took early on before the review.
@EssamWisam - okay, please merge and edit as you want and generate pdf in the review issue so I can review the latest revision. Thank you.
Due to the JOSS submission:
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6310
statement of need
to an upper level