Closed svilupp closed 1 year ago
The overall test suite keeps failing but that should be independent of my changes. I'll investigate it tomorrow.
This PR is ready for review. It would be awesome if you could take a look @deyandyankov .
I've added docstrings and tests for the new method.
For visibility, the relevant tests pass but the overall test suite fails, because my computer blocks localhost (not sure how common/uncommon that is), but everything passes if I changed it to standard 127.0.0.1 (see tests fix branch)
this is now merged, I've bumped the version to 0.4.0 and have submitted the new version to be registered in General. Thank you for your contribution!
Thanks for the PR! I'll review this evening.
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 10:55 J S, @.***> wrote:
This PR is ready for review. It would be awesome if you could take a look @deyandyankov https://github.com/deyandyankov .
I've added docstrings and tests for the new method.
For visibility, the relevant tests pass but the overall test suite fails, because my computer blocks localhost (not sure how common/uncommon that is), but everything passes if I changed it to standard 127.0.0.1 (see tests fix branch https://github.com/svilupp/MLFlowClient.jl/tree/fix-test-suite)
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JuliaAI/MLFlowClient.jl/pull/22#issuecomment-1202273000, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWZRGYXS4HLSTJLVQPS5T3VXDWCFANCNFSM55IUHFDA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
TL;DR This is a proposal to enable remote logging (eg, Databricks or internal MLFlow servers)
Closes #21
Implementation:
headers
, where user can provide authentication details for their remote server (eg, basic auth, bearer)headers
has been hidden from the pretty-print (ShowCase)