Closed saschatimme closed 6 years ago
Here is a little thing I missed from time to time. This adds the possibility to construct matrices of variables via
@polyvar x[1:3, 1:2]
What do you think?
Coverage increased (+0.007%) to 99.025% when pulling cc272522dc23c6a9bdc9e05b03adc61433d4a436 on polyvar-matrix into 4ebe3e246c3a0ec14124ba5b0f1fc1de4062cf84 on master.
mhm CI failure is due to an error on 0.7 alpha (type inference fails)
The issue on 0.7 alpha can be addressed in a separate PR :)
Here is a little thing I missed from time to time. This adds the possibility to construct matrices of variables via
What do you think?