Closed saschatimme closed 6 years ago
Merging #32 into 0.7-only will increase coverage by
<.01%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 0.7-only #32 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 99.63% 99.63% +<.01%
============================================
Files 14 14
Lines 546 554 +8
============================================
+ Hits 544 552 +8
Misses 2 2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/var.jl | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 624c004...eb7968a. Read the comment docs.
I'm only using v0.7 too
Thanks. Consistency is good!
This changes the behaviour of
@polyvar
to always return a tuple of the declared variables. The previous behaviour seems to lead to some confusion.This addresses [#]85(https://github.com/JuliaAlgebra/MultivariatePolynomials.jl/issues/85) in MultivariatePolynomials. cc @chriscoey
Note that this PR is currently against the 0.7 branch, I could backport this to 0.6 if there is some need to get this in a 0.6 release.