saschatimme
commented
6 years ago Here is a benchmark:
Benchmark Report for StaticPolynomials
Job Properties
- Time of benchmarks:
- Target: 2 May 2018 - 11:26
- Baseline: 2 May 2018 - 11:30
- Package commits:
- Target: 194698
- Baseline: fe936e
- Julia commits:
- Target: 0d7248
- Baseline: 0d7248
- Julia command flags:
- Target:
-O3 - Baseline:
-O3
- Target:
- Environment variables:
- Target: None
- Baseline: None
Results
A ratio greater than 1.0 denotes a possible regression (marked with :x:), while a ratio less
than 1.0 denotes a possible improvement (marked with :white_check_mark:). Only significant results - results
that indicate possible regressions or improvements - are shown below (thus, an empty table means that all
benchmark results remained invariant between builds).
| ID | time ratio | memory ratio |
|---|---|---|
["evaluate", "Float64", "chandra4"] |
1.18 (5%) :x: | 1.00 (1%) |
["evaluate", "Float64", "katsura5"] |
0.84 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["evaluate", "Float64", "katsura7"] |
1.10 (5%) :x: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "chandra4"] |
0.94 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "chandra5"] |
0.92 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "cyclic5"] |
0.92 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "cyclic6"] |
0.90 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "cyclic7"] |
0.95 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "cyclic8"] |
0.91 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura10"] |
0.69 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura5"] |
0.81 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura6"] |
0.76 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura7"] |
0.72 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura8"] |
0.69 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura9"] |
0.69 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "rps10"] |
0.74 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Float64", "chandra5"] |
0.87 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Float64", "cyclic7"] |
0.93 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Float64", "cyclic8"] |
0.89 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Float64", "fourbar"] |
0.91 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Float64", "katsura10"] |
0.85 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Float64", "katsura7"] |
0.90 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Float64", "katsura8"] |
0.93 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Float64", "katsura9"] |
0.85 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["jacobian", "Float64", "rps10"] |
1.22 (5%) :x: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "chandra5"] |
0.94 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "cyclic5"] |
0.95 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "fourbar"] |
0.93 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura10"] |
0.75 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura5"] |
0.84 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura6"] |
0.81 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura7"] |
0.89 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura8"] |
0.92 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "katsura9"] |
0.90 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}", "rps10"] |
0.72 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Float64", "chandra5"] |
0.91 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Float64", "cyclic5"] |
0.92 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Float64", "cyclic7"] |
0.90 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Float64", "cyclic8"] |
0.88 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Float64", "fourbar"] |
1.07 (5%) :x: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Float64", "katsura5"] |
0.93 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Float64", "katsura6"] |
0.85 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
["static jacobian", "Float64", "katsura9"] |
0.91 (5%) :white_check_mark: | 1.00 (1%) |
Benchmark Group List
Here's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
["evaluate", "Complex{Float64}"]["evaluate", "Float64"]["jacobian", "Complex{Float64}"]["jacobian", "Float64"]["static jacobian", "Complex{Float64}"]["static jacobian", "Float64"]
Julia versioninfo
Target
Julia Version 0.6.1
Commit 0d7248e2ff (2017-10-24 22:15 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590 CPU @ 3.30GHz
WORD_SIZE: 64
"openSUSE Leap 42.3"
uname: Linux 4.4.120-45-default #1 SMP Wed Mar 14 20:51:49 UTC 2018 (623211f) x86_64 x86_64
Memory: 15.560203552246094 GB (283.09765625 MB free)
Uptime: 2.774538e6 sec
Load Avg: 1.22314453125 0.97900390625 0.74609375
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590 CPU @ 3.30GHz:
speed user nice sys idle irq
#1 3638 MHz 3188261 s 5043 s 582893 s 272475714 s 0 s
#2 3500 MHz 2952696 s 3668 s 466830 s 273536119 s 0 s
#3 3699 MHz 3001340 s 6864 s 478103 s 273467661 s 0 s
#4 3601 MHz 2946078 s 6810 s 464624 s 273599895 s 0 s
BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Haswell)
LAPACK: libopenblas64_
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-3.9.1 (ORCJIT, haswell)
codecov-io
I noticed an inefficiency in the gradient routine. It could (and did) happen that we evaluated polynomials where the leading coefficient was 0.