Closed jagot closed 4 years ago
FEDVR.t is an AbstractVector. Is changing this breaking according to SemVer?
FEDVR.t
AbstractVector
I would say no, in any case v0.x.x is experimental so need to be overly pedantic
(Or another way to think of it: it's only a breaking change if it actually breaks extant code in dependent packages.)
FEDVR.t
is anAbstractVector
. Is changing this breaking according to SemVer?