Open ioannisPApapadopoulos opened 1 year ago
No clue... maybe the weight has that factor of 2 in it?
There's a factor 2 to some power in the polynomials defined im FastTransforms, see https://mikaelslevinsky.github.io/FastTransforms/transforms.html#disk2cxf
Maybe that's where this originates, some difference in conventions?
Convenctions in Weighted
vs. what the weighted is defined as? Should we change this to be consistent?
I think so. This can lead to really nasty untraceable errors and doesn't make sense syntax wise.
I think we should really focus on making things less consistent, not more
Was gonna propose random complex phases to improve stability with a seed based on the SHA256 checksum of the user's System
folder, but maybe that's still too consistent.
@dlfivefifty The lowering
Zernike(0,1) \ Weighted(Zernike(0,1))
is a factor of 2 off. This also seems to be confirmed in the tests..?https://github.com/JuliaApproximation/MultivariateOrthogonalPolynomials.jl/blob/cb0fb241eecc49fbdb873a5cd2b7de098897d355/test/test_disk.jl#L303
Is there a reason for this?