Tdbtcb

[prakharcode]

1

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 178

• 14 of 14 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.5%) to 86.933%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 177:	0.5%
Covered Lines:	326
Relevant Lines:	375

---

💛 - Coveralls

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@0c3938b). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #24   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   86.49%           
=========================================
  Files             ?        7           
  Lines             ?      348           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      301           
  Misses            ?       47           
  Partials          ?        0

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/conversions.jl	100% <100%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 0c3938b...d24d056. Read the comment docs.

[helgee]

I was able to reproduce the test failure on Win32 on my Windows machine but I actually think that this an ERFA problem. The results from @prakharcode's code are consistent in 32/64 bits whereas the ERFA results are not.

[helgee]

I will merge this when I have fixed the problem within ERFA.

[helgee]

@prakharcode Forget what I said before and see my comment in the code.