Adding AstroImages as a second format would override load when the user has both packages installed (and maintain the status-quo if the user only has FITSIO installed).
The FileIO integration with FITSIO does not appear to be documented so hopefully this wouldn't break anyone's workflow.
Basically I wanted to check with the FITSIO maintainers that registering a second package that can read/write FITS files won't break anyone's workflow.
Hi all, I've been working on a PR to AstroImages.jl which relates to a few issues here:
Once merged, I would like to register AstroImages with FileIO so that users can
load("abc.fits")
and get an AstroImage but I see that FITSIO is already registered : https://github.com/JuliaIO/FileIO.jl/blob/f0e5b9568d684bb4c6851e1b737b9a344d22504c/src/registry.jl#L467Adding AstroImages as a second format would override
load
when the user has both packages installed (and maintain the status-quo if the user only has FITSIO installed). The FileIO integration with FITSIO does not appear to be documented so hopefully this wouldn't break anyone's workflow.Basically I wanted to check with the FITSIO maintainers that registering a second package that can read/write FITS files won't break anyone's workflow.
Thanks!
Edit the WIP docs for the update to AstroImages are here for now: https://sefffal.github.io/AstroImages.jl/dev/