Closed mortenpi closed 4 years ago
There are some docs issues, but the upgrade to 0.25 looks smooth. @jagot did you figure out if we need MathJax (in other repos), or whether KaTeX is sufficient?
KaTeX is not sufficient in other repos (don't remember exactly, but I think I could not get eqrefs and such things to work), so I think our conclusion was to use MathJax everywhere, to be consistent.
What are the "docs issues"?
Alright, I'll change this over to MathJax then before we merge.
What are the "docs issues"?
Doctests not passing, parse
included in two places, some bad at-refs. I.e. all the build warnings.
Alright, I'll change this over to MathJax then before we merge.
Scratch that, it already is using MathJax :laughing: So I'd say this is good to go.
Thanks!
Bump Documenter to the upcoming 0.24 (currently pinned to the
mp/katjax
branch withdocs/Manifest.toml
).The LaTeX definitions can now be done in
make.jl
(JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl#1097), so no need to load thelatex.js
(which was a bit unreliable, since we were actually loading and configuring MathJax twice).Here is a demo: https://mortenpi.eu/gsoc2019-mockups/bulma/v14/AtomicLevels/
Once merged, will fix #45.