Open denizyuret opened 9 years ago
:+1: what's the status of this?
Nevermind, I just saw you did this in 217c8d7, so close this issue?
Does this really work?
julia> using CUDArt
julia> using CUBLAS
julia> x = rand(10); y = rand(10);
julia> d_x = CudaArray(x); d_y = CudaArray(y);
julia> dot(d_x, d_y)
ERROR: MethodError: `dot` has no method matching dot(::CUDArt.CudaArray{Float64,1}, ::CUDArt.CudaArray{Float64,1})
julia> VERSION
v"0.4.1"
I think dot is in Base.LinAlg rather than Base.LinAlg.BLAS. We should probably importall that as well. I'll test this.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:18 PM Dominique notifications@github.com wrote:
Does this really work?
julia> using CUDArt julia> using CUBLAS julia> x = rand(10); y = rand(10); julia> d_x = CudaArray(x); d_y = CudaArray(y); julia> dot(d_x, d_y) ERROR: MethodError:
dot
has no method matching dot(::CUDArt.CudaArray{Float64,1}, ::CUDArt.CudaArray{Float64,1}) julia> VERSIONv"0.4.1"— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/JuliaGPU/CUBLAS.jl/issues/1#issuecomment-161851863.
Hmm, it seems a bit more complicated. Base.LinAlg and Base.LinAlg.BLAS each export a different version of dot, so it is not clear which we should extend. I submitted an issue about this: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/14268
Hi Nick,
Currently CUBLAS does not export or modify any existing functions, but provides separate CUBLAS versions like CUBLAS.axpy! etc. (If I understand things correctly). If you add the line:
to the beginning of CUBLAS.jl, (see module usage), then it will be possible for the users to write generic code that works whether the inputs are Arrays or CudaArrays.
best, deniz