JuliaCI / Coverage.jl

Take Julia code coverage and memory allocation results, do useful things with them
MIT License
174 stars 68 forks source link

updates for v1.5, etc. #289

Closed vtjnash closed 3 years ago

vtjnash commented 4 years ago

Fixes #273 Fixes https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/38173

codecov-io commented 4 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #289 (5169eeb) into master (d1dfc39) will increase coverage by 19.41%. The diff coverage is 94.54%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #289       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   67.28%   86.70%   +19.41%     
===========================================
  Files           3        3               
  Lines         162      188       +26     
===========================================
+ Hits          109      163       +54     
+ Misses         53       25       -28     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/codecovio.jl 86.41% <92.30%> (+21.86%) :arrow_up:
src/coveralls.jl 86.79% <96.55%> (+17.28%) :arrow_up:

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update d1dfc39...5169eeb. Read the comment docs.

DilumAluthge commented 4 years ago

FWIW, since Travis is ending its unlimited free tier, it might be worth moving this package's CI to GitHub Actions at some point.

DilumAluthge commented 4 years ago

Travis was passing earlier, now it seems to be failing.

coveralls commented 3 years ago

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 926


Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/coveralls.jl 18 19 94.74%
src/codecovio.jl 19 21 90.48%
<!-- Total: 37 40 92.5% -->
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
src/coveralls.jl 1 66.98%
src/codecovio.jl 2 72.84%
<!-- Total: 3 -->
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 913: 13.5%
Covered Lines: 130
Relevant Lines: 148

💛 - Coveralls
vtjnash commented 3 years ago

Yeah, I was still testing different settings and did that intentionally. This has many new updates now, and should be good to review.