JuliaCI / Coverage.jl

Take Julia code coverage and memory allocation results, do useful things with them
MIT License
174 stars 68 forks source link

Update Codecov upload API to v4 (replacement for #304) #318

Closed DilumAluthge closed 3 years ago

DilumAluthge commented 3 years ago

Closes #304

Here is this diff for this PR versus PR #304: https://github.com/JuliaCI/Coverage.jl/compare/aa/codecov-v4...dpa/codecov-v4

coveralls commented 3 years ago

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 933962705


Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
src/coveralls.jl 2 94.23%
src/codecovio.jl 3 86.87%
<!-- Total: 5 -->
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 926834392: 0.3%
Covered Lines: 184
Relevant Lines: 203

💛 - Coveralls
codecov[bot] commented 3 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #318 (0b0e47e) into master (b79485e) will increase coverage by 0.33%. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #318      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.30%   90.64%   +0.33%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         196      203       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits          177      184       +7     
  Misses         19       19              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/codecovio.jl 86.86% <100.00%> (+3.17%) :arrow_up:
src/coveralls.jl 94.23% <0.00%> (-1.93%) :arrow_down:

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update b79485e...0b0e47e. Read the comment docs.

DilumAluthge commented 3 years ago

@vtjnash @ararslan Take a look at this PR and let me know what you think.

DilumAluthge commented 3 years ago

Also, changing the version of the Codecov API that we use - is that a breaking change or a nonbreaking change?

ararslan commented 3 years ago

It's not really exposed to the user in terms of API, so IMO not breaking

DilumAluthge commented 3 years ago

It's not really exposed to the user in terms of API, so IMO not breaking

Sounds good to me!

I have bumped the minor version number.