Closed timholy closed 3 years ago
Files with Coverage Reduction | New Missed Lines | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
src/codecovio.jl | 2 | 87.38% | ||
src/coveralls.jl | 2 | 94.29% | ||
<!-- | Total: | 4 | --> |
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 1308404670: | 0.5% |
Covered Lines: | 189 |
Relevant Lines: | 208 |
Merging #327 (a7a3088) into master (c3fe9bc) will increase coverage by
0.47%
. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #327 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.09% 90.56% +0.47%
==========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 212 212
==========================================
+ Hits 191 192 +1
+ Misses 21 20 -1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/coveralls.jl | 94.28% <0.00%> (-1.91%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/codecovio.jl | 86.91% <0.00%> (+2.80%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c3fe9bc...a7a3088. Read the comment docs.
This is for a class I'm teaching, and the homework gets assigned today, so I'll merge.
The rewords some of the instructions in the README for local coverage measurement. The major changes & their motivations are:
Pkg.test(; coverage=true)
above manual measurement. Most users will want the simpler option..info
tracefile. This allows users to determine when they need to supply the more complex set of options. By presenting it as a choice it also makes it clearer that you don't need to execute both lines.