Closed kshyatt closed 9 years ago
Better as a PR?
My hope was that someone else would do the work of actually testing that out, but yes, probably.
laziness fight between us and @staticfloat? dunno where I'd put my money there
laziness fight between us and @staticfloat? dunno where I'd put my money there
Hah!
How does #25 look to you guys?
So we've got a failure:
ERROR: MethodError: `getindex` has no method matching getindex(::Tuple{ASCIIString,Array{Union{Int64,Void},1}}, ::ASCIIString)
Closest candidates are:
getindex(::Tuple, !Matched::Int64)
getindex(::Tuple, !Matched::Real)
getindex(::Tuple, !Matched::AbstractArray{Bool,N})
...
in todict at /home/ubuntu/.julia/v0.4/CoverageBase/src/CoverageBase.jl:75
in merge_coverage at /home/ubuntu/.julia/v0.4/CoverageBase/src/CoverageBase.jl:59
in process_options at ./client.jl:282
in _start at ./client.jl:406
Did I screw something up, or does CoverageBase
need to be altered?
@IainNZ needs to tag Coverage.jl
Doing now.
thanks
I may have been wrong about that, it might still be failing the merge step even after Coverage was tagged?
Working now?
Since we now have codecov.io working in CoverageBase, all that should be necessary is to take
to
I think we may not need the full
git info
that Coveralls needed. We can test it out and see. The codecov stuff runs off the same.cov
files as the Coveralls stuff so we only need to run the tests once. We don't yet have a codecov.io repo set up forJuliaLang/julia
but that's a 1 minute process.