Closed kshyatt closed 9 years ago
So previously, we would run Coveralls.process()
which would save out coveralls.jld
, and we would run Codecov.process()
which would save out codecov.jld
. We'd then move those files to <prefix>_nonlined.jld
, and merge them in with their own separate merge()
commands. Throughout this whole process, Coveralls
and Codecov
had separate pipelines, as it were.
Now, you've merged the merge step such that the results
variable is reading in from coveralls_*.jld
only. As that is the case, can we get rid of the codecov_*.jld
files completely? Could we not call them coveralls_*.jld
at all, and just call them coverage.jld
, coverage_noninlined.jld
and coverage_inlined.jld
?
Oops! Yeah, we only need one set of .jld
s because @IainNz refactored Coverage.jl.
lgtm!
The CoverageBase and Coverage syntax has changed. I've updated the buildbot script so everything should run ok now!