Closed bjarthur closed 9 years ago
This would be great!
+1 for this, at least there should be an option to search package description (many packages names don't reflect their functionality). Do you want to solve a differential equation? No luck, because searching for "differential" doesn't return any results.
You can search package descriptions right now - just use the search functionality in your browser.
As for searching READMEs, I don't think its as good an idea as you might think as many important packages don't use their READMEs like that, e.g. https://github.com/JuliaStats/DataFrames.jl
I didn't know it was intentional. It would be cool if it worked like I described though, I suppose some people (including me) could be mislead this. And then, why do you need the search function at all when you can find everything using a browser?
I'm thinking of removing the search by name too - it seems fairly redundant. Theres a more general package discovery problem right now, and the solution isn't so much sorting as categorizing/tagging - theres been some discussion but no one has dedicated the time to getting it off the ground yet.
the package descriptions are frequently redundant with the names, and sometimes neither are informative. would it make sense / be easy to search the documentation too?