Closed ExpandingMan closed 2 years ago
This is ready to merge. the AbstractTrees
release got tagged today.
Merging #15 (f2b1412) into master (2b8a995) will decrease coverage by
4.41%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #15 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 96.52% 92.10% -4.42%
==========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 115 114 -1
==========================================
- Hits 111 105 -6
- Misses 4 9 +5
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/LeftChildRightSiblingTrees.jl | 91.34% <100.00%> (-4.81%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/abstracttrees.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2b8a995...f2b1412. Read the comment docs.
any objections to merging?
Ok, should be ready to merge now.
This PR contains updates for the upcoming
AbstractTrees
v0.4 (which, as of writing, is yet to be tagged).I took the liberty of changing
isroot
to be a method ofAbstractTrees.isroot
. I suppose technically this is breaking, but I think it's very unlikely to break any dependencies. There's nothing preventing us from reverting this change, but it seemed silly to have two separate functions, so I changed it.I've also removed compatibility with and CI for julia before 1.6. Since 1.6 has been LTS for a while now, I assume this will be uncontroversial.
I will update here when AbstractTrees v0.4 is tagged.