Transition to Github Action workflow

[vchuravy]

cc: @JuliaCon/editors @xuanxu

I set up the actions in this repository. Trying on one of the reviews for this year.

https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-review/issues/101 https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-papers/actions/runs/3387796496/jobs/5628995886

There are probably a bunch of todos, that I forgotten about from our discussion this summer. @arfon @xuanxu do you remember the steps we need to do? I recall us discussing a custom image with texlive to be able to compile the our Latex papers?

[remram44]

You seem to be sending useless automated comments on long-closed issues in a different repository:

• https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/116#issuecomment-1302421426
• https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/101#issuecomment-1302426897

[xuanxu]

The actions in this repository are currently identical to the ones in the JOSS repository. Every configuration value regarding repositories and journal data should be customized to use JCon values. A couple of examples in one of the workflows: branch_prefix should be jcon, and GH_REPO here should be JuliaCon/proceedings-review

[xuanxu]

And in every workflow the paper-action is currently trying to compile the paper with the inara image used by JOSS. That is the step that should be replaced with an action running something that compiles the JCon LaTeX papers.

[vchuravy]

The actions in this repository are currently identical to the ones in the JOSS repository. Every configuration value regarding repositories and journal data should be customized to use JCon values. A couple of examples in one of the workflows: branch_prefix should be jcon, and GH_REPO here should be JuliaCon/proceedings-review

Grr, seems that I copied the wrong files. I had set that up correctly before, but apparently forgot to pull before I copied over the files...

[lucaferranti]

done :tada: