Closed whedon closed 1 year ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Failed to discover a Statement of need
section in paper
Wordcount for paper.tex
is 5545
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.22 s (187.5 files/s, 270863.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG 8 1 1 48211
Julia 21 414 924 5980
TeX 8 325 231 2734
TOML 2 306 1 1418
Ruby 1 8 4 45
Markdown 1 13 0 35
YAML 1 2 0 21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 42 1069 1161 58444
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'e2ef7bcc454b0a1556d674fe' was
gathered on 2022/10/27.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Can Ozmaden 1 57 0 100.00
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Can Ozmaden 57 100.0 0.0 7.02
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1287/opre.38.5.911 is OK
- 10.1109/ISSSTA.1992.665623 is OK
- 10.3390/s121013417 is OK
- 10.1109/TWC.2004.833467 is OK
- 10.1109/TPDS.2018.2872064 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02673 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5870363 is OK
- 10.1109/ICINIS.2008.99 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03349 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5933659 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5933726 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/s10291-016-0516-2 may be a valid DOI for title: Correlation acceleration in GNSS software receivers using a CUDA-enabled GPU
- 10.1109/plans.1996.509077 may be a valid DOI for title: Adaptive antenna arrays for interference cancellation in GPS and GLONASS receivers
- 10.33012/2018.15873 may be a valid DOI for title: Estimation of antenna array manifolds based on sparse measurements
- 10.1186/s13638-018-1132-3 may be a valid DOI for title: Research on multi-constellation GNSS compatible acquisition strategy based on GPU high-performance operation
- 10.22457/jmi.v20a05192 may be a valid DOI for title: Satellite Navigation Simulation Signal Generation Method Based on GPU Acceleration
- 10.1109/globalsip.2015.7418431 may be a valid DOI for title: An accelerated signal tracking module using a heterogeneous multi-GPU platform for real-time GNSS software receiver
- 10.4018/ijghpc.2014070102 may be a valid DOI for title: Accelerating a cloud-based software GNSS receiver
- 10.33012/2016.14576 may be a valid DOI for title: Accelerating GNSS software receivers
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.29 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
@whedon assign @vchuravy as editor
OK, the editor is @vchuravy
@ozmaden Can you update the DOIs? Also do you have reviewers to suggest?
@vchuravy if you havent found any reviewers, I could review this, I have some working experience with satellite positioning and receivers architecture, as well as Julia working experience ofc
@vchuravy I will fix the DOI asap, seems like I just need to remove the 'https://doi.org/' prefix. I do not have specific reviewers in mind. If @lucaferranti would like to review my work, I would be very happy to get his feedback
@whedon add @lucaferranti as reviewer
OK, @lucaferranti is now a reviewer
@whedon add @maleadt as reviewer
OK, @maleadt is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-review/issues/128.
Submitting author: @ozmaden (Can Özmaden) Repository: https://github.com/ozmaden/GPUAcceleratedTracking Version: Editor: @vchuravy Reviewers: @lucaferranti, @maleadt Managing EiC: Valentin Churavy
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JCON @ozmaden. Currently, there isn't an JCON editor assigned to your paper.
The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @vchuravy.
@ozmaden if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JCON and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JCON submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: