Closed editorialbot closed 2 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper source files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.02 s (920.2 files/s, 216248.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TeX 8 271 194 2693
Ruby 1 8 4 45
Markdown 1 12 0 29
YAML 1 0 0 13
TOML 1 2 0 8
Julia 2 3 1 7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 14 296 199 2795
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
13 Mathieu Besançon
2 Christian Schilling
2 Jeffrey Sarnoff
2 Valentin Churavy
1 Benoît Legat
1 Carsten Bauer
1 Hendrik Ranocha
1 Jorge Pérez Zerpa
1 Ludovic Räss
1 Patrick Altmeyer
1 Simon Byrne
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1287/opre.38.5.911 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.tex
is 2185
🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need
section in paper
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot add @lucaferranti as editor
I'm sorry @lucaferranti, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.
@editorialbot add @matbesancon as editor
I'm sorry @lucaferranti, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.
@arfon @xuanxu any idea why editorialbot does not recognize my authority? I should be in editorial board: https://proceedings.juliacon.org/about
@lucaferranti editorial permissions are determined by GitHub team membership (not by the proceedings website). @xuanxu can you remind me how we figure out which team this is?
I thought the proceedings website reads the info from the same github team though?
maybe some typos in the team name somewhere?
@editorialbot list editors
List of JuliaCon editors
@arfon
@fcdimitr
@lucaferranti
@luraess
@matbesancon
@odow
@pitsianis
I'm sorry @lucaferranti, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.
This is very weird... Can you try again @lucaferranti?
@editorialbot add @lucaferranti as editor
I'm sorry @lucaferranti, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.
@arfon yep doesn't work :(
mmm I think I found the issue, here: https://github.com/openjournals/buffy/blob/juliacon/config/settings-production.yml#L9-L10
teams:
editors: JuliaCon/jcon-editors
eics: JuliaCon/jcon-eics
but I believe the first team-name should be editors
?
@whedon add @lucaferranti as editor
My name is now @editorialbot
@editorialbot add @lucaferranti as editor
I'm sorry @lucaferranti, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.
damn, I tried changing the team name from Editors
to jcon-editors
to match the name in the settingsn, but didn't seem to work
@editorialbot list editors
List of JuliaCon editors
The list is empty```
@editorialbot list editors
List of JuliaCon editors
@arfon
@fcdimitr
@lucaferranti
@luraess
@matbesancon
@odow
@pitsianis
ok now I am a bit confused
the config has
editors: JuliaCon/jcon-editors
and that actually seems to work since @editorialbot list editors
works. This is trange, because jcon-editors
is not the name of the team https://github.com/orgs/JuliaCon/teams/editors and changing the name of the team to jcon-editors
actually breaks things.
Now I am starting to think that the issue is with the eic
team, since effectively assigning the editor is an EiC task.
A few observations:
There is a team jcon-eics
in JuliaCon organization which matches the name in teh config
I checked and this team does not have access to these repositories, so maybe that's the issue, but that is also a subteam of editors
I don't understand why JuliaCon/jcon-editors
works the team is called only editors
. @xuanxu @arfon can you comment on the syntax of that config setting?
@editorialbot add @lucaferranti as editor
I'm sorry @lucaferranti, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.
@editorialbot list editors
List of JuliaCon editors
@arfon
@fcdimitr
@lucaferranti
@luraess
@matbesancon
@odow
@pitsianis
@editorialbot add @lucaferranti as editor
I'm sorry @lucaferranti, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.
ok, I gave the jcon-eics
team write access ot this and the papers repository (second last attempt) but didn't work.
Then I thought, maybe I need to remove the jcon-
from the name (for analogy with JuliaCon/jcon-editors
working despite the team is JuliaCon/editors
) so I tried to rename the team to simply eics
but didn't help.
Hi! You are mixing two different things here. The teams that are authorized to do things are the ones configured under the "teams" key in line 9 of the config file. The list of people you get when running the "list editors" command comes from a responder made to list members of a team, and that is configured en line 35 of the production config file. Right now there are two different named in those places. (sorry by my slow anwsers, i'm on a trip without my laptop and poor internet)
a-haa thank you @xuanxu , that's what tricked me before.
I opened a PR to buffy to udpate the correct team name: https://github.com/openjournals/buffy/pull/104
@editorialbot list reviewers
You can take a look at the list of people that have already agreed to review for JCON here.
@editorialbot list reviewers
You can take a look at the list of people that have already agreed to review for JCON here.
@editorialbot add @lucaferranti as editor
Assigned! @lucaferranti is now the editor
@editorialbot add @arfon as reviewer
@arfon added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @lucaferranti as reviewer
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@luraess<!--end-author-handle-- (Ludovic Räss) Repository: https://github.com/luraess/JuliaConSubmission.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@lucaferranti<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @arfon, @matbesancon Managing EiC: Luca Ferranti
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JCON @luraess. Currently, there isn't a JCON editor assigned to your paper.
@luraess if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JCON submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: