search

JuliaCon / proceedings-review

7 stars 1 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: JSOSuite.jl: Solving continuous optimization problems with JuliaSmoothOptimizers #151

Closed editorialbot closed 5 months ago

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@tmigot<!--end-author-handle-- (Tangi Migot) Repository: https://github.com/JuliaSmoothOptimizers/JSOSuite.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): jcon-paper Version: 0.1.1 Editor: !--editor-->@odow<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @sshin23, @mzagorowska Managing EiC: Mathieu Besançon

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://proceedings.juliacon.org/papers/80fccf1e96250bd37a5b25ec0ac38495"><img src="https://proceedings.juliacon.org/papers/80fccf1e96250bd37a5b25ec0ac38495/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://proceedings.juliacon.org/papers/80fccf1e96250bd37a5b25ec0ac38495/status.svg)](https://proceedings.juliacon.org/papers/80fccf1e96250bd37a5b25ec0ac38495)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JCON @tmigot. Currently, there isn't a JCON editor assigned to your paper.

The AEiC suggestion for the handling editor is @odow.

@tmigot if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JCON submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper source files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (1546.8 files/s, 206695.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TeX                              8            274            200           2633
Julia                           17            142            230           1114
TOML                             7            181              1            899
Markdown                         9            199              0            621
YAML                             8              7              5            225
Ruby                             1              8              4             45
CSS                              1              5              0             22
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            51            816            440           5559
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    66  tmigot
    21  RenanOD
    16  Abel Soares Siqueira
    15  github-actions[bot]
     7  JSOBot
     5  Tangi Migot
     4  Alexis Montoison
     3  Monssaf Toukal
     2  Abel Siqueira
     2  Dominique
     2  Renan Domingues
     1  Julia TagBot
     1  abelsiqueira
     1  geoffroyleconte
editorialbot commented 5 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3969045 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2558627 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.05187 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4605982 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6940304 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1287/ijoc.2014.0623 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3994983 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2629034 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2574162 is OK
- 10.1137/15M1020575 is OK
- 10.1287/mnsc.36.5.519 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3700941 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2655082 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10434673 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3991143 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4758376 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04736 is OK
- 10.1007/s101070100263 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3948381 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03991 is OK
- 10.1007/s10589-020-00201-2 is OK
- 10.1137/060654797 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4309783 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2559295 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7153564 is OK
- 10.1007/s10589-014-9687-3 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1188851 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3672094 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8174885 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: ReverseDiff.jl
- No DOI given, and none found for title: NLPModelsAlgencan.jl
- 10.2139/ssrn.4601442 may be a valid DOI for title: Accelerating optimal power flow with GPUs: SIMD ab...

INVALID DOIs

- 10.1007/0-387-30065-1\_4 URL is INVALID
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.tex is 1040

🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

License info:

✅ License found: Mozilla Public License 2.0 (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

odow commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot assign @odow as editor

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Assigned! @odow is now the editor

odow commented 5 months ago

@mzagorowska I see your name in the list of potential reviewers. Are you interested in this paper?

odow commented 5 months ago

@frapac or @sshin23 are either of you free to review this? JuliaCon functions like JOSS, so it shouldn't require too much time. The paper is only two pages, and once we have two reviewers, there is a short checklist of review items.

odow commented 5 months ago

@tmigot: you should take a look at the comments of the bot: a few DOIs need fixing, and you should include an explicit "Statement of need" section.

You can make changes by pushing new commits to your repo, and then commenting @editorialbot generate pdf in this issue.

mzagorowska commented 5 months ago

@mzagorowska I see your name in the list of potential reviewers. Are you interested in this paper?

Yes, sure. What's the deadline?

sshin23 commented 5 months ago

Sure. I can review it. Where can I find the instruction?

tmigot commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

tmigot commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Hello @tmigot, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set juliacon-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
tmigot commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 5 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3969045 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2558627 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.05187 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4605982 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6940304 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1287/ijoc.2014.0623 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3994983 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2629034 is OK
- 10.1007/0-387-30065-1 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2574162 is OK
- 10.1137/15M1020575 is OK
- 10.1287/mnsc.36.5.519 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3700941 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2655082 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10434673 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3991143 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4758376 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04736 is OK
- 10.1007/s101070100263 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3948381 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03991 is OK
- 10.1007/s10589-020-00201-2 is OK
- 10.1137/060654797 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4309783 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2559295 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7153564 is OK
- 10.1007/s10589-014-9687-3 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1188851 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3672094 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8174885 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.4601442 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: ReverseDiff.jl
- No DOI given, and none found for title: NLPModelsAlgencan.jl

INVALID DOIs

- None
tmigot commented 5 months ago

@tmigot: you should take a look at the comments of the bot: a few DOIs need fixing, and you should include an explicit "Statement of need" section.

You can make changes by pushing new commits to your repo, and then commenting @editorialbot generate pdf in this issue.

Thanks @odow for the feedback. I missed that the "Statement of need" section title was mandatory, it is now corrected. DOI issues are fixed.

odow commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot assign @sshin23 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

odow commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot add @sshin23 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

@sshin23 added to the reviewers list!

odow commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot add @mzagorowska as reviewer

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

@mzagorowska added to the reviewers list!

odow commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-review/issues/161.

odow commented 5 months ago

@mzagorowska and @sshin23 thank you for agreeing to review.

The review will take place over at: https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-review/issues/161

For the review, start by generating a checklist with @editorialbot generate my checklist and then check of each item in turn.

@mzagorowska: there is no explicit deadline, you're a volunteer, so it's just a best effort that fits your schedule.