Closed whedon closed 3 years ago
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/TPDS.2018.2872064 is OK
- 10.1162/neco_a_01096 is OK
- 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2727545 is OK
- 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00393-9 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-papers/pull/5
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-papers/pull/5, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
@MichielStock all good here, congratulations
(we will run all the final accept in batch at the end)
@whedon accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary:
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/TPDS.2018.2872064 is OK
- 10.1162/neco_a_01096 is OK
- 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2727545 is OK
- 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00393-9 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @JuliaCon/jcon-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right: https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-papers/pull/9
If the paper PDF and Crossref deposit XML look good in https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-papers/pull/9, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the flag deposit=true
e.g.
@whedon accept deposit=true
@whedon accept deposit=true
I'm sorry @arfon, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editor-in-chiefs are allowed to do.
@whedon accept deposit=true
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JCON! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Party like you just published a paper! πππ¦ππ»π€
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@vchuravy @matbesancon - looks like this is mostly working now π so I'm going to close this issue.
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://proceedings.juliacon.org/papers/10.21105/jcon.00015/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/jcon.00015)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/jcon.00015">
<img src="https://proceedings.juliacon.org/papers/10.21105/jcon.00015/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://proceedings.juliacon.org/papers/10.21105/jcon.00015/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/jcon.00015
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
JuliaCon Proceedings is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@michielstock<!--end-author-handle-- (Michiel Stock) Repository: https://github.com/michielStock/Kronecker.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: Editor: !--editor-->@matbesancon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @christianpeel, @mcognetta Archive:
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@christianpeel & @mcognetta, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://proceedings.juliacon.org/guide/reviewers. Any questions/concerns please let @matbesancon know.
β¨ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks β¨
Review checklist for @christianpeel
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Paper format
paper.tex
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Content
Review checklist for @mcognetta
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Paper format
paper.tex
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Content