Closed whedon closed 5 years ago
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @matbesancon it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
What happens now?
This submission is currently in a pre-review
state which means we are waiting for the assigned editor (@matbesancon) to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:
You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
PDF failed to compile for issue #17 with the following error:
===========Latexmk: Missing input file: 'dirtytalk.sty' from line
'! LaTeX Error: File dirtytalk.sty' not found.' Latexmk: Missing input file: 'dirtytalk.sty' from line '! LaTeX Error: File
dirtytalk.sty' not found.'
Failure to make 'paper.pdf'
Collected error summary (may duplicate other messages):
pdflatex: Command for 'pdflatex' gave return code 1
Refer to 'paper.log' for details
Looks like we failed to compile the PDF
@eschnett would you be interested in taking a look at this submission?
you might need to use lualatex
to compile it and also some extra packages
I have already done some Travis CI compile testing using lualatex
with this configuration:
https://github.com/chakravala/Math-Research-Notes/blob/master/.travis.yml
hi @chakravala, can you include in your repository the required dependencies, it should work all the way with the whedon workflow before reviewers can look at it
@matbesancon I can review the paper. I'm using the Grassmann.jl
package myself, but there is no conflict of interest.
Thanks!
@whedon commands
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands
# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer
# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer
# Remove a GitHub user from the reviewers of this submission
@whedon remove @username as reviewer
# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors
# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers
# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor
# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive
# Set the software version at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set v1.0.1 as version
# Open the review issue
@whedon start review
EDITORIAL TASKS
# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf
# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name
# Remind an author or reviewer to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@whedon remind @reviewer in 2 weeks
# Ask Whedon to accept the paper and deposit with Crossref
@whedon accept
# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references
@whedon add @eschnett as reviewer
OK, @eschnett is now a reviewer
@snoeyink would you be interested in reviewing this proceeding?
Sure. Tell me how to go about it, as I have not reviewed for JuliaCon before.
(Though I have for many conferences and journals.)
Jack Snoeyink@cs.unc.edu Computer Science, UNC Chapel Hill
From: Mathieu Besançon Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 10:52 AM To: JuliaCon/proceedings-review Cc: Jack Snoeyink; Mention Subject: Re: [JuliaCon/proceedings-review] [PRE REVIEW]: Differentialgeometric algebra using Leibniz, Grassmann (#17)
@snoeyink would you be interested in reviewing this proceeding? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
great thanks. This issue will be closed with a new one starting for the review. You can discuss and request modifications to the paper and package in the issue or post issues in Grassmann.jl directly.
@whedon add @snoeyink as reviewer
OK, @snoeyink is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-review/issues/18. Feel free to close this issue now!
Submitting author: @chakravala (Michael Reed) Repository: https://github.com/chakravala/Grassmann.jl Editor: @matbesancon Reviewers: @eschnett, @snoeyink
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JuliaCon @chakravala. The JuliaCon editor @matbesancon, will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
@chakravala if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JuliaCon and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JuliaCon submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: