Closed jakubwro closed 4 years ago
Wow, this is great, thank you very much! I'll review later.
This PR also reminds me that I should move documentation to Documenter :sweat:
Merging #8 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=====================================
Files 2 3 +1
Lines 16 25 +9
=====================================
+ Hits 16 25 +9
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/Deconvolution.jl | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/lucy.jl | 100% <100%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4cb5227...77977db. Read the comment docs.
Hi @giordano , I added docs and more illustrative usage example
Awesome, I'll have a look in the next few days!
@giordano, I readded docs, but I have a feeling that messed something with git #history. Please have a look.
The history is not a problem, we can just squash everything :wink:
I followed your struggle, I'm really sorry for this. I can feel your pain, I had similar problems a few days ago. In theses cases I think that it's easier to do a clean merge of the target branch on yours rather than rebasing.
The history is not a problem, we can just squash everything wink
I followed your struggle, I'm really sorry for this. I can feel your pain, I had similar problems a few days ago. In theses cases I think that it's easier to do a clean merge of the target branch on yours rather than rebasing.
Right, it's not the first time I have this problem with rebase.
Documentation is available at https://juliadsp.github.io/Deconvolution.jl/dev/. Thank you so much @jakubwro and @abhishalya! This new method looks very good!
Hi, please review. If you think it's worth merging I'll update docs.