Closed anandijain closed 4 years ago
Merging #11 into master will decrease coverage by
4.19%
. The diff coverage is0.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #11 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.00% 89.80% -4.20%
==========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 150 157 +7
==========================================
Hits 141 141
- Misses 9 16 +7
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/TableOperations.jl | 89.80% <0.00%> (-4.20%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 36109cf...593cd7a. Read the comment docs.
Rebased and updated in https://github.com/JuliaData/TableOperations.jl/pull/14
Attempt at solving #9
I think adding a test or example will be important, as well as dealing with the fact that the x field in NarrowTypes will have an outdated schema. I'm not a huge fan of this, but I suppose that anyone with the intention of creating a NarrowTypes struct, will evaluate and receive just a Table with the narrowed schema.
Would love feedback!
Thanks
This is what I've enumerated as todos
[ ] row access checking?