Open aviatesk opened 3 months ago
It looks like this "optimization" introduces a very bad interaction with the new lineinfo format: https://github.com/JuliaDebug/JuliaInterpreter.jl/blob/28dd37ce0f7bcb357bfb820b1d6b53b98aa3796c/src/optimize.jl#L76-L92
julia> using JuliaInterpreter julia> fnone1() = nothing; julia> let m = only(methods(fnone1)) JuliaInterpreter.FrameCode(m, JuliaInterpreter.get_source(m); optimize=true).src.debuginfo end Core.DebugInfo(Symbol("REPL[2]"), nothing, svec(), "\x01\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x01\x01\0") julia> fnone2() = nothing; julia> let m = only(methods(fnone2)) JuliaInterpreter.FrameCode(m, JuliaInterpreter.get_source(m); optimize=true).src.debuginfo end Core.DebugInfo(Symbol("REPL[4]"), nothing, svec(), "")
Originally posted by @aviatesk in https://github.com/JuliaDebug/JuliaInterpreter.jl/issues/606#issuecomment-2012195722
It looks like this "optimization" introduces a very bad interaction with the new lineinfo format: https://github.com/JuliaDebug/JuliaInterpreter.jl/blob/28dd37ce0f7bcb357bfb820b1d6b53b98aa3796c/src/optimize.jl#L76-L92
Originally posted by @aviatesk in https://github.com/JuliaDebug/JuliaInterpreter.jl/issues/606#issuecomment-2012195722