Closed kahaaga closed 2 years ago
Merging #127 (8a625b4) into main (e85b0fb) will increase coverage by
1.43%
. The diff coverage is84.78%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #127 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.17% 81.61% +1.43%
==========================================
Files 35 36 +1
Lines 792 854 +62
==========================================
+ Hits 635 697 +62
Misses 157 157
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/complexity_measures/sample_entropy.jl | 80.55% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/encoding/outcomes.jl | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
...imators/permutation_ordinal/SymbolicPermutation.jl | 72.97% <ø> (ø) |
|
...imators/permutation_ordinal/spatial_permutation.jl | 91.30% <ø> (ø) |
|
...ities_estimators/histograms/rectangular_binning.jl | 81.33% <78.94%> (-11.53%) |
:arrow_down: |
.../complexity_measures/reverse_dispersion_entropy.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/encoding/gaussian_cdf.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/encoding/ordinal_pattern.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
.../probabilities_estimators/dispersion/dispersion.jl | 76.19% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
...rc/probabilities_estimators/diversity/diversity.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 7 more |
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
(tag me explicitly when you think this is final and ready to review)
(tag me explicitly when you think this is final and ready to review)
@Datseris If the tests pass and the documentation looks good after the latest commit, this is ready for reviewing.
What is RectangularBinMapping? Where does it come from? Does it replace the RectangularBinEncoder I have created? If so, why is the git diff like this? It never shows the RectangularBinEncoder being replcaed by the Mapping.
The RectangularBinMapping
is exactly RectangularBinEncoder
, just renamed, so that all encoding schemes have a common naming convention (like GaussianMapping
and OrdinalMapping
). Nothing else should have changed.
p.s.: The fact that this new FixedRectangularBinning was written in the same file as the normal binning and was written in the lines before the normal binning made the git diff unecessarily difficult to review. If you check, it seems like most of the RectangularBinning code is overwritten/changed in this PR.
The git diff became weird when I merged main
into the diversity_probs
branch. I guess it was because of what you said about the new lines added before the existing ones?
The RectangularBinMapping is exactly RectangularBinEncoder, just renamed, so that all encoding schemes have a common naming convention (like GaussianMapping and OrdinalMapping).
But these aren't intuitive names though. OrdinalPatterns is more intuitive than OrdinalMapping. I would argue that once again we violate the "one word per concept principle". Why are we using Mapping
here? Aren't these Encoding
s? We decided on the Encoding word, we might as well use it. Hence, RectangularBinEncoding
, OrdinalPatternEncoding
, etc.
Ok, I think I addressed all your comments now, @Datseris. The CI docs still fail to run, though, and it seems to be related to the use of ChaosTools in the docs (but they look good locally).
ill take care of the docs in a different PR
What's new in this PR?
This PR implements the diversity entropy (Wang et al., 2020), and its underlying probability estimator.
Changes/additions:
FixedRectangularBinning
symbolization scheme, which is required for the new method (fixes #118).alphabet_length
implemented for bothRectangularBinning
andFixedRectangularBinning
(fixes #103).Diversity
probability estimator, with analytical tests from the paper.FixedRectangularBinning
andDiversity
.RectangularBinning
to highlight how it is different fromFixedRectangularBinning
.References
Wang, X., Si, S., & Li, Y. (2020). Multiscale diversity entropy: A novel dynamical measure for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(8), 5419-5429.