Closed Jay-sanjay closed 1 year ago
Merging #320 (0e5a9c1) into main (60ad04b) will increase coverage by
0.20%
. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #320 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.76% 87.96% +0.20%
==========================================
Files 76 76
Lines 1920 1920
==========================================
+ Hits 1685 1689 +4
+ Misses 235 231 -4
see 1 file with indirect coverage changes
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Hey, @Jay-sanjay! Please when opening a PR, add a few sentences describing the changes. This makes it easier for the repository maintainers to understand what the contribution is.
What are these changes meant to test? You've added a bunch of println
lines, applied to many essentially identical est
variables. There's no actual tests added - only printing. Is your intention to test the show
method for SpatialOrdinalPatterns
? If so, please remove the println
statements. Instead, add a test at the top of the file somewhere (with a comment indicating what you're testing). The test must actually test something (i.e. using the @test
macro), not only print.
Base.show
for custom types in Julia# It this is the definition and custom show method
struct MyFancyStruct
myfield
end
Base.show(io::IO, x::MyFancyStruct) = print(io, "Heyo, I'm printing this nicely: $(x.myfield)")
# Then test that the output is actually what we want
using Test
out = repr(MyFancyStruct("flowers")) # capture the output to console as a string
@test occursin("flowers", out)
@test occursin("Heyo, I'm printing this nicely:", out)
Applying this to SpatialOrdinalPatterns
, you need to check out how we've defined the custom show method for that type. Then, verify that the output string for an instance of this type, when printed to console, contains at least part of what we've defined the output to be. The repr
function gives your the actual text output.
@kahaaga Firstly thank you sir for the feedback . I will work on it accordingly . And exactly, I was trying to test the show method for SpatialOrdinalPatterns.jl . I will add the testcases the way you said .
increasing coverage for: 1) SpatialOrdinaryPatterns.jl added testcases to test the show method for SpatialOrdinalPatterns For increasing code coverage issue #85 fixing